Scholastic schools of ethics and
morality always give us consent to go for lesser evil when we have to choose
between the two evils. When we are forced to choose between the supposedly two
evils the lesser evil is always permissible in order to justify greater evil
that we would be forced to commit otherwise.
In the wake of Savita
Halappanavar’s death that was caused she was denied the legal permission by the
Irish government to go for an abortion and the end result was fatal that she
lost her life and left her husband and family mourning. The untimely death of the
Indian woman Savita posed so many ethical and moral questions that whether the
fetus growing in her child should have been saved letting her die or she should
have been saved letting the fetus die.
The law of the land where she has
been living in, did not let her to go for an abortion that in any circumstance
the fetus is given predominant consideration than the mother herself who is the
caused cause of the fetus in her womb. So what happened in Savita’s case, both fetus
and mother died eventually. Fetus could have been saved only if the mother was
winning her battle for life and life of fetus is solely depending on the
wellbeing of the mother.
In this particular circumstance,
killing the child which was growing in the womb of Savita is a lesser evil
compared with letting the mother die if she has to give birth to the child. In
the process of saving the child letting the mother die is a grater evil. So in
any such given scenario, the lesser evil is always permissible that is to kill
the child in order to save the mother. Now a few might raise their eye brows that
what about the right of the child in womb to be born but who knows if the child
would be born could be physically and mentally sound.
Even if the child is saved
letting the mother die, the certainty of the survival of the child is always at
stake and the biological mother is the best one to bring up the child. Mother
being a grown up citizen of the society she has certain duties towards the
society and social responsibility. The mother has her duties towards her
husband, in-laws, her own parents and siblings in particular.
The probability of a child
becoming anti-social and not becoming a good human being in the absence of
mother’s love, care and affection is very high so it is better that the child
die and if God permits she shall give birth to another child and bring up the
child as a responsible citizen. In this either or choice game, the decision of
mother (if she is in a position to decide) should be given due consideration as
well as her husband’s.
Of course, the land should have
its own laws and regulations, however, the authority should listen to what the husband-wife
got to tell and the same should be given the due consideration before
implementing the law of the land because at the end of the these are the two individuals
deeply getting affected in the either or choice game.
No comments:
Post a Comment